Danish vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Danish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Danes

Ecuadorians

Excellent
Poor
8,781
SOCIAL INDEX
85.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
48th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ecuadorian Integration in Danish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 288,253,844 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Danish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.586. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Danes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Danes corresponds to an increase of 41.2 Ecuadorians.
Danish Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

Danish vs Ecuadorian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Danish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (31.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 35.1%), householder income over 65 years ($63,117 compared to $54,958, a difference of 14.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,619 compared to $93,739, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,041 compared to $53,911, a difference of 1.6%), median earnings ($46,392 compared to $45,214, a difference of 2.6%), and median female earnings ($37,730 compared to $39,117, a difference of 3.7%).
Danish vs Ecuadorian Income
Income MetricDanishEcuadorian
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,095
Poor
$41,958
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,900
Tragic
$95,114
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,676
Poor
$82,070
Median Earnings
Average
$46,392
Poor
$45,214
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,246
Tragic
$51,596
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,730
Fair
$39,117
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$53,041
Exceptional
$53,911
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,221
Poor
$91,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$105,619
Tragic
$93,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,117
Tragic
$54,958
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
22.9%

Danish vs Ecuadorian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Danish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 64.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 59.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 57.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 4.5%).
Danish vs Ecuadorian Poverty
Poverty MetricDanishEcuadorian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Average
12.8%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Good
20.7%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
15.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
14.9%

Danish vs Ecuadorian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Danish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 44.1%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 42.8%), and unemployment (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.7%).
Danish vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricDanishEcuadorian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.5%

Danish vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Danish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.7% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 42.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.50%).
Danish vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricDanishEcuadorian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.3%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
79.9%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
44.7%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.3%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Tragic
82.3%

Danish vs Ecuadorian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Danish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 30.1%), married-couple households (51.1% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 17.5%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (66.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Danish vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricDanishEcuadorian
Family Households
Exceptional
66.0%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.7%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
51.1%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.17
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
50.5%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Poor
33.3%

Danish vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Danish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 245.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 92.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 75.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.5% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 20.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (63.3% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 50.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 75.9%).
Danish vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricDanishEcuadorian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
22.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
77.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
63.3%
Tragic
42.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
24.7%
Tragic
14.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
4.5%

Danish vs Ecuadorian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Danish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 101.8%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 30.4%), and college, under 1 year (68.5% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Danish vs Ecuadorian Education Level
Education Level MetricDanishEcuadorian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Tragic
90.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.8%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Tragic
81.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.5%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.7%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.4%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.1%
Tragic
35.4%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Danish vs Ecuadorian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Danish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 41.7%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 35.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.9%).
Danish vs Ecuadorian Disability
Disability MetricDanishEcuadorian
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.8%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%