Kiowa vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Kiowa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Kiowa

Ecuadorians

Poor
Poor
2,045
SOCIAL INDEX
18.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
274th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ecuadorian Integration in Kiowa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,245,057 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Kiowa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.714. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.628% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kiowa corresponds to a decrease of 628.4 Ecuadorians.
Kiowa Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

Kiowa vs Ecuadorian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,815 compared to $93,739, a difference of 25.3%), median household income ($65,914 compared to $82,070, a difference of 24.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,776 compared to $91,574, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 3.1%), householder income over 65 years ($51,140 compared to $54,958, a difference of 7.5%), and median male earnings ($45,094 compared to $51,596, a difference of 14.4%).
Kiowa vs Ecuadorian Income
Income MetricKiowaEcuadorian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,102
Poor
$41,958
Median Family Income
Tragic
$80,885
Tragic
$95,114
Median Household Income
Tragic
$65,914
Poor
$82,070
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,232
Poor
$45,214
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,094
Tragic
$51,596
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,074
Fair
$39,117
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,733
Exceptional
$53,911
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$74,776
Poor
$91,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$74,815
Tragic
$93,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,140
Tragic
$54,958
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.6%
Exceptional
22.9%

Kiowa vs Ecuadorian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (29.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 52.8%), single male poverty (18.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 46.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.050%), married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 9.6%).
Kiowa vs Ecuadorian Poverty
Poverty MetricKiowaEcuadorian
Poverty
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
29.2%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
24.5%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.2%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
23.7%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Tragic
18.3%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
26.9%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.5%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.5%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
15.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
14.9%

Kiowa vs Ecuadorian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 22.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Kiowa vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricKiowaEcuadorian
Unemployment
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
25.2%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.5%

Kiowa vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 18.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (79.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.0% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 5.1%).
Kiowa vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricKiowaEcuadorian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.4%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.0%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.2%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.2%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.6%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.8%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.2%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.3%
Tragic
82.3%

Kiowa vs Ecuadorian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.1% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 29.6%), divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 23.6%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.80%), currently married (43.2% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.4%).
Kiowa vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricKiowaEcuadorian
Family Households
Tragic
61.4%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.0%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
43.1%
Poor
33.3%

Kiowa vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 97.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 39.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 13.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 28.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 38.9%).
Kiowa vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricKiowaEcuadorian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.5%
Tragic
22.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.6%
Tragic
77.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Tragic
42.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.5%
Tragic
14.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
4.5%

Kiowa vs Ecuadorian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 79.2%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 29.2%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 1.3%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Kiowa vs Ecuadorian Education Level
Education Level MetricKiowaEcuadorian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Tragic
90.6%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.2%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Tragic
81.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.8%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.0%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Tragic
35.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.8%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Kiowa vs Ecuadorian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 72.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (17.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 62.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 8.6%), disability age over 75 (54.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 14.5%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.5%).
Kiowa vs Ecuadorian Disability
Disability MetricKiowaEcuadorian
Disability
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.4%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.6%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.2%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.3%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.7%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.6%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.6%