Immigrants from Western Africa vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 255,729,727 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Immigrant from Western Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.154. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Western Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Western Africa corresponds to an increase of 29.0 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($49,621 compared to $53,911, a difference of 8.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,676 compared to $91,574, a difference of 6.9%), and per capita income ($40,294 compared to $41,958, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($94,638 compared to $95,114, a difference of 0.50%), median female earnings ($39,351 compared to $39,117, a difference of 0.60%), and median earnings ($44,893 compared to $45,214, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 13.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.30%), female poverty (15.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 17.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.4%), births to unmarried women (36.0% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.84%), family households with children (28.3% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.0% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 51.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 8.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.4% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 17.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 18.2%), no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 14.7%), and college, under 1 year (62.8% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.5%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 14.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.3%).