Icelander vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Icelander
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Icelanders
Ecuadorians
8,070
SOCIAL INDEX
78.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
89th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Icelander Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,805,372 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.894. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.509% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 509.0 Ecuadorians.
Icelander vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 19.9%), householder income over 65 years ($61,270 compared to $54,958, a difference of 11.5%), and median family income ($104,282 compared to $95,114, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,109 compared to $39,117, a difference of 0.020%), median earnings ($46,916 compared to $45,214, a difference of 3.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,560 compared to $91,574, a difference of 4.3%).
Income Metric | Icelander | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $44,987 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Good $104,282 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Good $85,797 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Good $46,916 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,415 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,109 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,247 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $95,560 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,261 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,270 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.5% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Icelander vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 43.8%), receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 41.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.23%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 4.3%).
Poverty Metric | Icelander | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Good 11.9% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Excellent 13.0% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.3% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.3% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.4% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.5% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.5% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 14.9% |
Icelander vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 27.7%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Icelander | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.0% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.9% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Icelander vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 29.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.61%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.36%).
Labor Participation Metric | Icelander | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.8% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.9% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 84.0% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Average 82.8% | Tragic 82.3% |
Icelander vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 20.3%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 9.8%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.64%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (63.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Icelander | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Tragic 63.3% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Good 47.0% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.3% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Poor 33.3% |
Icelander vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 136.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 65.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 16.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 38.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 53.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Icelander | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.5% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.0% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 4.5% |
Icelander vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 69.4%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 40.7%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Icelander | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.5% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.1% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.3% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Excellent 39.5% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.5% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Icelander vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 27.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Disability Metric | Icelander | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Fair 11.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Poor 11.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Excellent 12.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Poor 5.7% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.3% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.7% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |