Immigrants from Latvia vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,404,334 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.670. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.396% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 395.7 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $41,958, a difference of 21.3%), median family income ($114,826 compared to $95,114, a difference of 20.7%), and median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $51,596, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $53,911, a difference of 4.2%), median female earnings ($43,099 compared to $39,117, a difference of 10.2%), and median earnings ($51,555 compared to $45,214, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 44.3%), receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 43.8%), and family poverty (7.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.3%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 22.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 17.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.89%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 31.4%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.5%), and births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.7%), family households (62.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 88.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 24.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 13.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 22.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 63.3%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 59.4%), and professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.8%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 13.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.42%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.63%).