Cheyenne vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,004,531 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Cheyenne communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.238. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cheyenne within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cheyenne corresponds to a decrease of 13.7 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($76,362 compared to $93,739, a difference of 22.8%), median household income ($66,974 compared to $82,070, a difference of 22.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,275 compared to $53,911, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,096 compared to $54,958, a difference of 1.6%), wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and median female earnings ($35,673 compared to $39,117, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (28.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 47.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 47.1%), and married-couple family poverty (9.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.89%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (10.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 100.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (16.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 63.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 20.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (74.8% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 24.3%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.4%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (63.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (42.3% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 94.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 85.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 61.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 13.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 29.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 61.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 43.0%), master's degree (11.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 24.6%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.1% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 0.39%), ged/equivalency (82.7% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 58.2%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 38.7%), and vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.3%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age over 75 (50.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 7.4%).