Immigrants from Latin America vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,143,331 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to an increase of 14.0 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,823 compared to $41,958, a difference of 13.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $91,574, a difference of 11.5%), and median female earnings ($35,307 compared to $39,117, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,265 compared to $54,958, a difference of 3.2%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $53,911, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 11.4%), married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.66%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.70%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.0%), births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 11.7%), and single mother households (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.8% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 0.39%), married-couple households (44.7% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.42 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 119.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 60.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 15.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 29.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 46.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 24.2%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 18.8%), and bachelor's degree (30.1% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.1%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.9%), female disability (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.5%).