Creek vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,035,447 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.692. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.041% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 41.1 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $106,611, a difference of 35.0%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $90,605, a difference of 33.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $99,900, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $53,185, a difference of 17.2%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $40,757, a difference of 21.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 55.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 49.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 22.5%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 20.4%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.97%), family households (64.2% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 27.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 69.8%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 61.1%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 59.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.2% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 64.9%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 54.6%), and hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.4%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.4%).