Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,149,144 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Immigrant from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.425. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.026% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina corresponds to an increase of 25.8 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,986 compared to $63,957, a difference of 14.2%), median household income ($79,888 compared to $90,605, a difference of 13.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,288 compared to $106,611, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,886 compared to $40,757, a difference of 4.8%), householder income under 25 years ($50,565 compared to $53,185, a difference of 5.2%), and wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 12.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 11.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.67%), poverty (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 14.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.90%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (44.4% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 6.9%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and family households (61.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (46.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 12.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.10%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.4%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.7%), and master's degree (14.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.0%), 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 11.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.1%).