Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Chilean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Chileans
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chilean Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,935,470 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.554% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 553.8 Chileans.
Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $46,459, a difference of 53.5%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $108,429, a difference of 50.2%), and median household income ($61,663 compared to $90,605, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $53,185, a difference of 17.5%), wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 18.7%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $40,757, a difference of 22.7%).
Income Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chilean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,256 | Exceptional $46,459 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $72,193 | Exceptional $108,429 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $61,663 | Exceptional $90,605 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,349 | Exceptional $48,504 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $39,543 | Exceptional $56,973 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,205 | Exceptional $40,757 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,248 | Exceptional $53,185 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $69,068 | Exceptional $99,900 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,774 | Exceptional $106,611 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $49,121 | Exceptional $63,957 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.1% | Fair 26.3% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 141.2%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 127.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (31.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 113.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 40.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 51.4%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 54.3%).
Poverty Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chilean |
Poverty | Tragic 24.4% | Excellent 11.8% |
Families | Tragic 20.4% | Excellent 8.5% |
Males | Tragic 22.9% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 25.9% | Excellent 12.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 24.7% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 29.5% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 31.7% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 34.2% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.0% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.2% | Excellent 4.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 20.8% | Fair 11.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.1% | Poor 12.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.5% | Excellent 11.0% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 101.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 98.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 92.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chilean |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 7.7% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 22.1% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 12.1% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.0% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.7% | Excellent 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.9% | Good 5.3% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 14.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 9.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chilean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.2% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 70.4% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.3% | Poor 35.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 68.6% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 77.5% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 77.7% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.1% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 75.1% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 72.5%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 62.5%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.43%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and family households (67.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 3.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chilean |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 65.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 37.9% | Exceptional 47.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.53 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 9.1% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 36.8% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 49.8% | Good 30.7% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 57.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 12.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 6.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chilean |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.6% | Excellent 9.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.7% | Good 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 50.0% | Excellent 56.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.9% | Good 19.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Good 6.4% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 84.7%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 74.5%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 68.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.11%).
Education Level Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chilean |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.8% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Average 97.1% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Average 96.0% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Average 95.7% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.1% | Good 93.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.6% | Excellent 92.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.7% | Excellent 91.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.1% | Good 89.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 77.5% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 52.8% | Exceptional 67.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 47.1% | Exceptional 62.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 31.8% | Exceptional 49.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 24.4% | Exceptional 41.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 70.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 63.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 13.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.0%).
Disability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chilean |
Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.2% | Poor 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 36.0% | Exceptional 22.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.7% | Exceptional 46.5% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Excellent 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 2.3% |