Japanese vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,227,831 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to a decrease of 3.8 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,870 compared to $46,459, a difference of 16.5%), median family income ($97,288 compared to $108,429, a difference of 11.5%), and median male earnings ($51,473 compared to $56,973, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,365 compared to $53,185, a difference of 1.6%), median female earnings ($38,528 compared to $40,757, a difference of 5.8%), and median earnings ($44,825 compared to $48,504, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 28.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 19.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.6%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.0%), male unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.2%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.8%), and births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.020%), family households (65.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 10.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.49%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 64.0%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 48.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 20.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 16.7%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.8%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 8.1%).