Hopi vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,432,097 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Hopi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.603. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hopi within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hopi corresponds to a decrease of 16.3 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hopi and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,177 compared to $46,459, a difference of 49.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,562 compared to $106,611, a difference of 41.1%), and median family income ($77,188 compared to $108,429, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($46,978 compared to $53,185, a difference of 13.2%), median female earnings ($33,932 compared to $40,757, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,925 compared to $63,957, a difference of 25.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hopi and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (27.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 130.7%), receiving food stamps (21.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 96.2%), and male poverty (20.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 93.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 23.5%), single female poverty (28.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 41.0%), and married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 43.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hopi and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (16.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 133.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (11.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 129.9%), and male unemployment (10.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 113.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hopi and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (58.4% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (66.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (76.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hopi and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (50.8% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 65.7%), single mother households (8.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 38.3%), and married-couple households (36.7% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.15%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 10.0%), and average family size (3.60 compared to 3.23, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hopi and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 38.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.0% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 4.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hopi and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (25.3% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 62.7%), master's degree (10.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 55.8%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.12%), 5th grade (97.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hopi and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (4.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 261.3%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.5%), and hearing disability (3.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age over 75 (52.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 13.9%).