Tongan vs Chilean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tongan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tongans

Chileans

Good
Excellent
7,132
SOCIAL INDEX
68.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
130th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chilean Integration in Tongan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,581,476 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Tongan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.291. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tongans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tongans corresponds to an increase of 14.7 Chileans.
Tongan Integration in Chilean Communities

Tongan vs Chilean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,693 compared to $46,459, a difference of 11.4%), householder income under 25 years ($56,972 compared to $53,185, a difference of 7.1%), and median male earnings ($53,218 compared to $56,973, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,604 compared to $99,900, a difference of 0.30%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,643 compared to $106,611, a difference of 1.9%), and median family income ($105,967 compared to $108,429, a difference of 2.3%).
Tongan vs Chilean Income
Income MetricTonganChilean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,693
Exceptional
$46,459
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,967
Exceptional
$108,429
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,076
Exceptional
$90,605
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,665
Exceptional
$48,504
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,218
Exceptional
$56,973
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,288
Exceptional
$40,757
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$56,972
Exceptional
$53,185
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,604
Exceptional
$99,900
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,643
Exceptional
$106,611
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$68,235
Exceptional
$63,957
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.5%
Fair
26.3%

Tongan vs Chilean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (12.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 28.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 20.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.3%), single mother poverty (26.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and single female poverty (18.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
Tongan vs Chilean Poverty
Poverty MetricTonganChilean
Poverty
Exceptional
10.8%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.8%
Exceptional
19.9%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
12.2%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.5%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Excellent
11.0%

Tongan vs Chilean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 31.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 23.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.0%).
Tongan vs Chilean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTonganChilean
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.9%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.5%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.4%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.9%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
6.7%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
5.3%

Tongan vs Chilean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.2% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.38%).
Tongan vs Chilean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTonganChilean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.5%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.2%
Poor
35.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.9%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.5%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Excellent
83.1%
Exceptional
83.4%

Tongan vs Chilean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.7%), family households with children (31.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 11.0%), and married-couple households (51.6% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.3% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.9%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and family households (69.6% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 6.9%).
Tongan vs Chilean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTonganChilean
Family Households
Exceptional
69.6%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
31.2%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
51.6%
Exceptional
47.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.3%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.1%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.4%
Good
30.7%

Tongan vs Chilean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 56.9%), no vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 37.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (63.5% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 34.7%).
Tongan vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTonganChilean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.2%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.9%
Good
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
63.5%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
26.5%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
10.0%
Good
6.4%

Tongan vs Chilean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 41.5%), master's degree (12.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 35.6%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.25%).
Tongan vs Chilean Education Level
Education Level MetricTonganChilean
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.3%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Poor
92.2%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.7%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.4%
Good
89.6%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Fair
64.5%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.8%
Exceptional
62.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
49.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.3%
Exceptional
41.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
16.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.2%

Tongan vs Chilean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 8.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.2%), female disability (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.1%).
Tongan vs Chilean Disability
Disability MetricTonganChilean
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.8%
Exceptional
22.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.3%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.3%