Navajo vs Chilean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Navajo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Navajo

Chileans

Poor
Excellent
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chilean Integration in Navajo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,719,902 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.209. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to a decrease of 3.7 Chileans.
Navajo Integration in Chilean Communities

Navajo vs Chilean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $46,459, a difference of 60.0%), median household income ($59,159 compared to $90,605, a difference of 53.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($69,759 compared to $106,611, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 17.6%), median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $40,757, a difference of 23.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $53,185, a difference of 25.5%).
Navajo vs Chilean Income
Income MetricNavajoChilean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$29,031
Exceptional
$46,459
Median Family Income
Tragic
$70,989
Exceptional
$108,429
Median Household Income
Tragic
$59,159
Exceptional
$90,605
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,999
Exceptional
$48,504
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,098
Exceptional
$56,973
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,046
Exceptional
$40,757
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$42,380
Exceptional
$53,185
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$66,529
Exceptional
$99,900
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$69,759
Exceptional
$106,611
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$47,722
Exceptional
$63,957
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.4%
Fair
26.3%

Navajo vs Chilean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 139.8%), family poverty (18.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 122.4%), and single male poverty (25.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 112.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 44.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 53.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 56.3%).
Navajo vs Chilean Poverty
Poverty MetricNavajoChilean
Poverty
Tragic
23.1%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Tragic
18.8%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
22.3%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
23.9%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
23.3%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
30.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
19.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
29.2%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
40.2%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.9%
Excellent
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
17.5%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.4%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.1%
Excellent
11.0%

Navajo vs Chilean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 112.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 103.2%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 94.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 30.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 30.5%).
Navajo vs Chilean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNavajoChilean
Unemployment
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
7.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
29.0%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.2%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.3%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.9%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.7%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
14.2%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.2%
Good
5.3%

Navajo vs Chilean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 15.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (73.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 13.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 14.6%).
Navajo vs Chilean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNavajoChilean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
56.6%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.2%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
32.1%
Poor
35.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
64.8%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.6%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
73.8%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Exceptional
83.4%

Navajo vs Chilean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 67.9%), single mother households (8.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 44.3%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.29%), family households (66.4% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 4.4%).
Navajo vs Chilean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNavajoChilean
Family Households
Exceptional
66.4%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.1%
Exceptional
47.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.65
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.8%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.0%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Good
30.7%

Navajo vs Chilean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 28.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.68%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.9%).
Navajo vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNavajoChilean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.8%
Good
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.3%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.3%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Good
6.4%

Navajo vs Chilean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 83.0%), master's degree (9.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 79.6%), and bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 74.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%).
Navajo vs Chilean Education Level
Education Level MetricNavajoChilean
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.1%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Poor
95.8%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.3%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.0%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.1%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.2%
Good
89.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.5%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.3%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.8%
Exceptional
62.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
32.6%
Exceptional
49.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
41.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
16.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.2%

Navajo vs Chilean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 61.5%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 51.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 10.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.6%).
Navajo vs Chilean Disability
Disability MetricNavajoChilean
Disability
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
33.3%
Exceptional
22.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
58.3%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.6%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.3%