Taiwanese vs Chilean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Taiwanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Taiwanese

Chileans

Good
Excellent
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chilean Integration in Taiwanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,937,803 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.381. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.498% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 498.3 Chileans.
Taiwanese Integration in Chilean Communities

Taiwanese vs Chilean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($49,804 compared to $53,185, a difference of 6.8%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and median male earnings ($55,556 compared to $56,973, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,455 compared to $46,459, a difference of 0.010%), median female earnings ($40,576 compared to $40,757, a difference of 0.45%), and median household income ($89,900 compared to $90,605, a difference of 0.78%).
Taiwanese vs Chilean Income
Income MetricTaiwaneseChilean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,455
Exceptional
$46,459
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,295
Exceptional
$108,429
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,900
Exceptional
$90,605
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,902
Exceptional
$48,504
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,556
Exceptional
$56,973
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,576
Exceptional
$40,757
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,804
Exceptional
$53,185
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,492
Exceptional
$99,900
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,180
Exceptional
$106,611
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,894
Exceptional
$63,957
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Fair
26.3%

Taiwanese vs Chilean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.2%), single father poverty (14.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and single male poverty (10.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.15%), receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.59%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.61%).
Taiwanese vs Chilean Poverty
Poverty MetricTaiwaneseChilean
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Good
11.0%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Good
13.1%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Exceptional
19.9%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.5%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Excellent
11.0%

Taiwanese vs Chilean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 36.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 28.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.7%).
Taiwanese vs Chilean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTaiwaneseChilean
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Average
5.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
6.5%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.3%

Taiwanese vs Chilean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.46%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.28%).
Taiwanese vs Chilean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTaiwaneseChilean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.8%
Poor
35.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
83.4%

Taiwanese vs Chilean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.4%), births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.020%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and currently married (45.8% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.7%).
Taiwanese vs Chilean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTaiwaneseChilean
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Exceptional
47.5%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Poor
45.8%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.0%
Good
30.7%

Taiwanese vs Chilean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 17.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 4.2%).
Taiwanese vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTaiwaneseChilean
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.4%
Good
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.0%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Good
6.4%

Taiwanese vs Chilean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.1%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.45%).
Taiwanese vs Chilean Education Level
Education Level MetricTaiwaneseChilean
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.5%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.3%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Good
89.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Good
66.4%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.7%
Exceptional
62.0%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.7%
Exceptional
49.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.0%
Exceptional
41.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.1%
Exceptional
16.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.2%

Taiwanese vs Chilean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.4%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.1%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.4%).
Taiwanese vs Chilean Disability
Disability MetricTaiwaneseChilean
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.7%
Exceptional
22.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%