Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,296,639 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.177. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($118,056 compared to $99,900, a difference of 18.2%), median male earnings ($66,903 compared to $56,973, a difference of 17.4%), and median earnings ($56,183 compared to $48,504, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $53,185, a difference of 7.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,872 compared to $63,957, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 17.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 15.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.97%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 14.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.54%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 22.5%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.2%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.23%), family households (64.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 37.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.7%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.9%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.8% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.10%), 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and high school diploma (89.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 25.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.67%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.3%).