Cherokee vs Chilean Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Cherokee
Chilean
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Cherokee
Chileans
36.7%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.7%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
79.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Chilean Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,419,943 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.316 and weighted average of 36.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,289,700 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.644 and weighted average of 30.7%, a difference of 19.5%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cherokee | Chilean |
| Minimum | 13.9% | 10.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 86.1% | 89.1% |
| Mean | 47.7% | 40.9% |
| Median | 42.9% | 32.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 35.4% | 27.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 55.8% | 44.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.5% | 17.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.1% | 23.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.0% | 23.4% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Subsaharan African (36.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Senegal (36.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Central American (36.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Comanche (36.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Nicaraguan (36.6%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Americans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 36.4% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 36.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 36.5% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 36.5% |
| French American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 36.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 36.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 36.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 36.7% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 36.7% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 36.7% |
| Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 36.7% |
| Senegalese | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 36.8% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 36.8% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 36.8% |
| Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 36.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Serbian (30.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Somali (30.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Italian (30.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Oceania (30.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and Northern European (30.6%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #141 | Excellent 30.5% |
| South Africans | 82.7 /100 | #142 | Excellent 30.5% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 82.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 30.5% |
| Czechs | 82.1 /100 | #144 | Excellent 30.5% |
| Immigrants | North America | 81.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 30.6% |
| Northern Europeans | 81.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 30.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 81.2 /100 | #147 | Excellent 30.6% |
| Chileans | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 30.7% |
| Serbians | 78.8 /100 | #149 | Good 30.7% |
| Somalis | 77.8 /100 | #150 | Good 30.7% |
| Italians | 77.0 /100 | #151 | Good 30.8% |
| Poles | 76.2 /100 | #152 | Good 30.8% |
| British | 76.0 /100 | #153 | Good 30.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 30.8% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 73.9 /100 | #155 | Good 30.9% |