Potawatomi vs Chilean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Potawatomi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Potawatomi

Chileans

Fair
Excellent
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chilean Integration in Potawatomi Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,885,223 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Potawatomi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.172. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Potawatomi within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.064% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Potawatomi corresponds to an increase of 63.7 Chileans.
Potawatomi Integration in Chilean Communities

Potawatomi vs Chilean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,613 compared to $106,611, a difference of 26.0%), median household income ($72,576 compared to $90,605, a difference of 24.8%), and median family income ($88,265 compared to $108,429, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.4%), householder income under 25 years ($46,462 compared to $53,185, a difference of 14.5%), and median male earnings ($48,768 compared to $56,973, a difference of 16.8%).
Potawatomi vs Chilean Income
Income MetricPotawatomiChilean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,046
Exceptional
$46,459
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,265
Exceptional
$108,429
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,576
Exceptional
$90,605
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,288
Exceptional
$48,504
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,768
Exceptional
$56,973
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,739
Exceptional
$40,757
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,462
Exceptional
$53,185
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,774
Exceptional
$99,900
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$84,613
Exceptional
$106,611
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,212
Exceptional
$63,957
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Fair
26.3%

Potawatomi vs Chilean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 34.8%), single male poverty (15.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 32.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.6%).
Potawatomi vs Chilean Poverty
Poverty MetricPotawatomiChilean
Poverty
Tragic
14.1%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Tragic
10.2%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
19.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.1%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Excellent
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.1%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.5%
Excellent
11.0%

Potawatomi vs Chilean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 33.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.96%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
Potawatomi vs Chilean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPotawatomiChilean
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Good
5.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Good
5.3%

Potawatomi vs Chilean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.5%).
Potawatomi vs Chilean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPotawatomiChilean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.8%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.2%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.0%
Poor
35.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.2%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.8%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.7%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
83.4%

Potawatomi vs Chilean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 18.1%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.8%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (63.3% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.9%).
Potawatomi vs Chilean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPotawatomiChilean
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.7%
Exceptional
47.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.2%
Good
30.7%

Potawatomi vs Chilean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.7%), no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 11.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 11.0%).
Potawatomi vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPotawatomiChilean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.3%
Good
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.0%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.3%
Good
6.4%

Potawatomi vs Chilean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 47.7%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 40.4%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.35%).
Potawatomi vs Chilean Education Level
Education Level MetricPotawatomiChilean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Average
89.0%
Good
89.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.8%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.6%
Exceptional
62.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.4%
Exceptional
49.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.9%
Exceptional
41.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
16.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.2%

Potawatomi vs Chilean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 44.1%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 43.6%), and male disability (14.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 5.5%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 6.6%).
Potawatomi vs Chilean Disability
Disability MetricPotawatomiChilean
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
22.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%