Malaysian vs Chilean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Malaysian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Malaysians

Chileans

Fair
Excellent
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chilean Integration in Malaysian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 151,670,055 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.526. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.052% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 51.9 Chileans.
Malaysian Integration in Chilean Communities

Malaysian vs Chilean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,194 compared to $46,459, a difference of 18.5%), median family income ($95,230 compared to $108,429, a difference of 13.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,291 compared to $99,900, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,615 compared to $53,185, a difference of 3.0%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and median female earnings ($37,298 compared to $40,757, a difference of 9.3%).
Malaysian vs Chilean Income
Income MetricMalaysianChilean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,194
Exceptional
$46,459
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,230
Exceptional
$108,429
Median Household Income
Tragic
$81,064
Exceptional
$90,605
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,844
Exceptional
$48,504
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,772
Exceptional
$56,973
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,298
Exceptional
$40,757
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,615
Exceptional
$53,185
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,291
Exceptional
$99,900
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,517
Exceptional
$106,611
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,244
Exceptional
$63,957
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Fair
26.3%

Malaysian vs Chilean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 18.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 18.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and single father poverty (14.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 5.1%).
Malaysian vs Chilean Poverty
Poverty MetricMalaysianChilean
Poverty
Tragic
13.1%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Poor
9.6%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
14.3%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.9%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Tragic
22.2%
Exceptional
19.9%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Excellent
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.7%
Excellent
11.0%

Malaysian vs Chilean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 7.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.88%).
Malaysian vs Chilean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricMalaysianChilean
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Average
5.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Poor
8.9%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Good
5.3%

Malaysian vs Chilean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.80%).
Malaysian vs Chilean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricMalaysianChilean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.5%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.7%
Poor
35.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.2%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Exceptional
83.4%

Malaysian vs Chilean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.2%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.2%), and births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (45.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.31 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.4%).
Malaysian vs Chilean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricMalaysianChilean
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.8%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Exceptional
47.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.31
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Poor
45.9%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.9%
Good
30.7%

Malaysian vs Chilean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 28.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 14.8%).
Malaysian vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricMalaysianChilean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Good
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.6%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Good
6.4%

Malaysian vs Chilean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 54.9%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 47.8%), and master's degree (12.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.75%), nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.76%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.76%).
Malaysian vs Chilean Education Level
Education Level MetricMalaysianChilean
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.8%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.3%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.2%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.5%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.8%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.2%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Good
89.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.3%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.2%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Exceptional
62.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.6%
Exceptional
49.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.9%
Exceptional
41.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
16.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.2%

Malaysian vs Chilean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 21.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 15.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.92%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 5.5%).
Malaysian vs Chilean Disability
Disability MetricMalaysianChilean
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
22.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%