Houma vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,877,720 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.021. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 7.9 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $106,611, a difference of 47.9%), wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 47.0%), and median household income ($62,575 compared to $90,605, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $56,973, a difference of 12.7%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $53,185, a difference of 19.9%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $48,504, a difference of 24.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 96.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 77.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (26.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 74.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 28.5%), married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 29.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 31.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 78.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 41.3%), and male unemployment (7.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 10.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 51.8%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.8%), and single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.86%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 30.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 22.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 137.2%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 124.6%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 114.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.66%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 82.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 68.2%), and vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 66.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 13.3%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 20.8%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.8%).