Immigrants from Asia vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 255,902,876 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.241. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($63,240 compared to $56,973, a difference of 11.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,787 compared to $99,900, a difference of 10.9%), and median household income ($99,933 compared to $90,605, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $63,957, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $53,185, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 11.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.53%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.24%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 14.5%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.2%), family households (66.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 0.41%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.5%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.7%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.6% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 20.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.0%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.2%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.3%).