White/Caucasian vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,685,293 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.551. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to an increase of 1.5 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($82,029 compared to $90,605, a difference of 10.4%), per capita income ($42,180 compared to $46,459, a difference of 10.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,668 compared to $99,900, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($53,925 compared to $56,973, a difference of 5.7%), householder income under 25 years ($50,336 compared to $53,185, a difference of 5.7%), and median earnings ($45,197 compared to $48,504, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 21.5%), single father poverty (18.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 16.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.68%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and male poverty (11.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 16.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.93%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 8.4%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.12%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and married-couple households (48.6% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 40.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.0%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.2%), and master's degree (13.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.8% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 29.6%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.20%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.4%).