Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,744,435 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.051. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 3.3 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $99,900, a difference of 28.3%), median male earnings ($70,146 compared to $56,973, a difference of 23.1%), and median household income ($111,519 compared to $90,605, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $63,957, a difference of 11.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $53,185, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 25.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 23.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.86%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 22.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.080%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 30.1%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 26.8%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.88%), family households (66.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.5%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.9%), and professional degree (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.37%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 35.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.010%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.2%).