Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,340,525 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Immigrant from Eastern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.154. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Africa corresponds to a decrease of 3.1 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 15.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,458 compared to $99,900, a difference of 9.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,467 compared to $106,611, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,644 compared to $40,757, a difference of 0.28%), median earnings ($46,969 compared to $48,504, a difference of 3.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,158 compared to $53,185, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (17.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 18.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 18.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.5%), single male poverty (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (68.5% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.6%), married-couple households (42.9% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.44%), births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 0.92%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.7% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.040%), no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.7% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.7%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and master's degree (16.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 10.8%), cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.91%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.5%).