Indian (Asian) vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,505,570 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.218. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $99,900, a difference of 19.6%), median household income ($105,262 compared to $90,605, a difference of 16.2%), and median male earnings ($66,078 compared to $56,973, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 0.60%), householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $53,185, a difference of 9.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $63,957, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 15.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.66%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.75%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 14.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.77%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.75%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 21.4%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.0%), and divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.040%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.41%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 42.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.55%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 35.2%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.0%), and no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.6% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.0%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 27.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.11%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.98%).