Cities with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Below $10,000 in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Family Income | $0-10k
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Below $10,000 in North Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Below $10,000 in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Below $10,000 in North Dakota

City Families with Income < $10k vs State vs National
1. Hannah 100.0% 2.0% (+98.0)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#37
2. Sarles 66.7% 2.0% (+64.7)#2 3.1% (+63.6)#70
3. Springbrook 50.0% 2.0% (+48.0)#3 3.1% (+46.9)#132
4. Fortuna 45.5% 2.0% (+43.5)#4 3.1% (+42.4)#162
5. Noonan 40.0% 2.0% (+38.0)#5 3.1% (+36.9)#211
6. East Dunseith 39.8% 2.0% (+37.8)#6 3.1% (+36.7)#222
7. Maddock 35.9% 2.0% (+33.9)#7 3.1% (+32.8)#279
8. Esmond 35.3% 2.0% (+33.3)#8 3.1% (+32.2)#289
9. Leal 33.3% 2.0% (+31.3)#9 3.1% (+30.2)#333
10. Ryder 29.0% 2.0% (+27.0)#10 3.1% (+25.9)#433
11. Bowdon 27.7% 2.0% (+25.7)#11 3.1% (+24.6)#484
12. Canton City Hensel 27.3% 2.0% (+25.3)#12 3.1% (+24.2)#497
13. Fort Totten 25.4% 2.0% (+23.4)#13 3.1% (+22.3)#571
14. Zeeland 21.1% 2.0% (+19.1)#14 3.1% (+18.0)#818
15. Stanton 20.3% 2.0% (+18.3)#15 3.1% (+17.2)#875
16. Coleharbor 20.0% 2.0% (+18.0)#16 3.1% (+16.9)#905
17. Lankin 19.0% 2.0% (+17.0)#17 3.1% (+15.9)#1,006
18. Nome 15.8% 2.0% (+13.8)#18 3.1% (+12.7)#1,354
19. Luverne 14.3% 2.0% (+12.3)#19 3.1% (+11.2)#1,623
20. Cannon Ball 13.7% 2.0% (+11.7)#20 3.1% (+10.6)#1,723
21. Towner 13.6% 2.0% (+11.6)#21 3.1% (+10.5)#1,751
22. Tappen 13.5% 2.0% (+11.5)#22 3.1% (+10.4)#1,776
23. Rolette 13.3% 2.0% (+11.3)#23 3.1% (+10.2)#1,816
24. Pekin 13.3% 2.0% (+11.3)#24 3.1% (+10.2)#1,825
25. Lisbon 12.7% 2.0% (+10.7)#25 3.1% (+9.60)#1,943
26. Belfield 12.0% 2.0% (+10.00)#26 3.1% (+8.90)#2,136
27. Bowman 11.8% 2.0% (+9.80)#27 3.1% (+8.70)#2,184
28. Pettibone 11.8% 2.0% (+9.80)#28 3.1% (+8.70)#2,208
29. Page 11.6% 2.0% (+9.60)#29 3.1% (+8.50)#2,265
30. Selfridge 11.5% 2.0% (+9.50)#30 3.1% (+8.40)#2,302
31. Emerado 11.1% 2.0% (+9.10)#31 3.1% (+8.00)#2,432
32. Mandaree 10.4% 2.0% (+8.40)#32 3.1% (+7.30)#2,684
33. Regent 10.3% 2.0% (+8.30)#33 3.1% (+7.20)#2,738
34. Fort Yates 9.1% 2.0% (+7.10)#34 3.1% (+6.00)#3,322
35. Hannaford 9.1% 2.0% (+7.10)#35 3.1% (+6.00)#3,326
36. New Town 9.0% 2.0% (+7.00)#36 3.1% (+5.90)#3,355
37. Finley 9.0% 2.0% (+7.00)#37 3.1% (+5.90)#3,382
38. Green Acres 8.8% 2.0% (+6.80)#38 3.1% (+5.70)#3,467
39. Cando 8.7% 2.0% (+6.70)#39 3.1% (+5.60)#3,519
40. Adams 8.3% 2.0% (+6.30)#40 3.1% (+5.20)#3,755
41. Wyndmere 8.2% 2.0% (+6.20)#41 3.1% (+5.10)#3,809
42. Halliday 7.9% 2.0% (+5.90)#42 3.1% (+4.80)#3,997
43. Arnegard 7.7% 2.0% (+5.70)#43 3.1% (+4.60)#4,137
44. Reeder 7.7% 2.0% (+5.70)#44 3.1% (+4.60)#4,144
45. Cayuga 7.7% 2.0% (+5.70)#45 3.1% (+4.60)#4,147
46. Mohall 7.6% 2.0% (+5.60)#46 3.1% (+4.50)#4,196
47. Marion 7.1% 2.0% (+5.10)#47 3.1% (+4.00)#4,592
48. Solen 7.1% 2.0% (+5.10)#48 3.1% (+4.00)#4,595
49. Tioga 6.9% 2.0% (+4.90)#49 3.1% (+3.80)#4,738
50. Pick City 6.9% 2.0% (+4.90)#50 3.1% (+3.80)#4,779
51. Hankinson 6.8% 2.0% (+4.80)#51 3.1% (+3.70)#4,833
52. Sherwood 6.8% 2.0% (+4.80)#52 3.1% (+3.70)#4,858
53. Dunseith 6.6% 2.0% (+4.60)#53 3.1% (+3.50)#5,018
54. Napoleon 6.6% 2.0% (+4.60)#54 3.1% (+3.50)#5,021
55. Wahpeton 6.5% 2.0% (+4.50)#55 3.1% (+3.40)#5,065
56. Hazelton 6.3% 2.0% (+4.30)#56 3.1% (+3.20)#5,348
57. Rolla 6.2% 2.0% (+4.20)#57 3.1% (+3.10)#5,444
58. Northwood 6.2% 2.0% (+4.20)#58 3.1% (+3.10)#5,450
59. Ashley 6.0% 2.0% (+4.00)#59 3.1% (+2.90)#5,671
60. Carson 6.0% 2.0% (+4.00)#60 3.1% (+2.90)#5,695
61. Plaza 6.0% 2.0% (+4.00)#61 3.1% (+2.90)#5,702
62. Belcourt 5.9% 2.0% (+3.90)#62 3.1% (+2.80)#5,773
63. Granville 5.9% 2.0% (+3.90)#63 3.1% (+2.80)#5,808
64. St Thomas 5.6% 2.0% (+3.60)#64 3.1% (+2.50)#6,182
65. Elgin 5.3% 2.0% (+3.30)#65 3.1% (+2.20)#6,550
66. Carrington 5.1% 2.0% (+3.10)#66 3.1% (+2.00)#6,785
67. Mayville 5.1% 2.0% (+3.10)#67 3.1% (+2.00)#6,787
68. Parshall 5.0% 2.0% (+3.00)#68 3.1% (+1.90)#6,970
69. Manvel 4.9% 2.0% (+2.90)#69 3.1% (+1.80)#7,168
70. Trenton 4.8% 2.0% (+2.80)#70 3.1% (+1.70)#7,300
71. Hazen 4.5% 2.0% (+2.50)#71 3.1% (+1.40)#7,696
72. Langdon 4.5% 2.0% (+2.50)#72 3.1% (+1.40)#7,714
73. Gladstone 4.5% 2.0% (+2.50)#73 3.1% (+1.40)#7,795
74. Tolna 4.5% 2.0% (+2.50)#74 3.1% (+1.40)#7,798
75. Verona 4.5% 2.0% (+2.50)#75 3.1% (+1.40)#7,800
76. Center 4.3% 2.0% (+2.30)#76 3.1% (+1.20)#8,109
77. Drake 4.3% 2.0% (+2.30)#77 3.1% (+1.20)#8,132
78. Sheyenne 4.3% 2.0% (+2.30)#78 3.1% (+1.20)#8,142
79. Lehr 4.2% 2.0% (+2.20)#79 3.1% (+1.10)#8,334
80. Jamestown 4.1% 2.0% (+2.10)#80 3.1% (+1.000)#8,367
81. Valley City 4.0% 2.0% (+2.00)#81 3.1% (+0.900)#8,605
82. Hettinger 3.9% 2.0% (+1.90)#82 3.1% (+0.800)#8,853
83. Ray 3.8% 2.0% (+1.80)#83 3.1% (+0.700)#9,077
84. Douglas 3.7% 2.0% (+1.70)#84 3.1% (+0.600)#9,311
85. Gwinner 3.5% 2.0% (+1.50)#85 3.1% (+0.400)#9,692
86. Watford City 3.4% 2.0% (+1.40)#86 3.1% (+0.300)#9,803
87. Hillsboro 3.4% 2.0% (+1.40)#87 3.1% (+0.300)#9,856
88. Mooreton 3.3% 2.0% (+1.30)#88 3.1% (+0.200)#10,174
89. Buffalo 3.2% 2.0% (+1.20)#89 3.1% (+0.100)#10,423
90. Grenora 3.1% 2.0% (+1.10)#90 3.1% (=0.000)#10,641
91. Grand Forks 2.8% 2.0% (+0.800)#91 3.1% (-0.300)#11,179
92. Garrison 2.8% 2.0% (+0.800)#92 3.1% (-0.300)#11,325
93. Hope 2.8% 2.0% (+0.800)#93 3.1% (-0.300)#11,401
94. New Rockford 2.7% 2.0% (+0.700)#94 3.1% (-0.400)#11,583
95. Devils Lake 2.6% 2.0% (+0.600)#95 3.1% (-0.500)#11,746
96. Lakota 2.6% 2.0% (+0.600)#96 3.1% (-0.500)#11,881
97. Shell Valley 2.5% 2.0% (+0.500)#97 3.1% (-0.600)#12,136
98. Richardton 2.5% 2.0% (+0.500)#98 3.1% (-0.600)#12,159
99. Bottineau 2.4% 2.0% (+0.400)#99 3.1% (-0.700)#12,395
100. Fessenden 2.4% 2.0% (+0.400)#100 3.1% (-0.700)#12,478

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Below $10,000 in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Below $10,000 in North Dakota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
66.7%
#3
50.0%
#4
45.5%
#5
40.0%
#6
39.8%
#7
35.9%
#8
35.3%
#9
33.3%
#10
29.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Below $10,000 in North Dakota?
Hannah has the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Below $10,000 in North Dakota with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Families with Income Below $10,000 in the State of North Dakota?
Percentage of Families with Income Below $10,000 in North Dakota is 2.0%.
What is the Percentage of Families with Income Below $10,000 in the United States?
Percentage of Families with Income Below $10,000 in the United States is 3.1%.