Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,047,939 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.426. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.134% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to an increase of 134.1 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,407 compared to $42,950, a difference of 14.8%), median female earnings ($35,629 compared to $40,257, a difference of 13.0%), and median earnings ($41,719 compared to $46,564, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $50,609, a difference of 2.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,066 compared to $90,372, a difference of 6.2%), and median household income ($78,166 compared to $83,289, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.6%), family poverty (10.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.5%), female unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.6%), births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and family households (67.0% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.92%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 50.6%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 37.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 32.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 42.3%), master's degree (11.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 39.7%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.79%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.79%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.7%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.2% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.9%).