Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
Chickasaw
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Mexican American Indians
Chickasaw
6.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
281st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,454,269 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.192 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,342,221 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 10.7%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mexican American Indian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.88% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 21.8% | 17.6% |
| Range | 20.9% | 16.0% |
| Mean | 8.4% | 7.8% |
| Median | 7.9% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.0% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 3.3% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Seminole (6.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Ute (6.4%, a difference of 0.39%), Dutch West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.50%), West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.51%), and Houma (6.4%, a difference of 0.56%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Somali (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | South America | 3.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Cherokee | 2.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Venezuelans | 2.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Fijians | 2.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 2.5 /100 | #241 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 1.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Iraqis | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Cree | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Tsimshian | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.1 /100 | #250 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 5.9% |