Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,923,429 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.011. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to an increase of 0.9 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,407 compared to $41,195, a difference of 10.1%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and median female earnings ($35,629 compared to $38,644, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,811 compared to $91,462, a difference of 0.72%), median family income ($90,918 compared to $92,837, a difference of 2.1%), and median household income ($78,166 compared to $80,341, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 18.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 16.5%), and receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (14.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.020%), female poverty (15.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 11.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.7%), family households with children (29.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.37%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 162.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 98.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 73.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 19.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 45.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 73.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 20.8%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 16.5%), and bachelor's degree (30.2% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 17.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.9%).