Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,989,592 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.578. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to an increase of 34.9 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,407 compared to $45,043, a difference of 20.4%), median male earnings ($47,990 compared to $56,064, a difference of 16.8%), and median family income ($90,918 compared to $106,188, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 0.81%), householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $52,374, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,089 compared to $61,976, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.6%), family poverty (10.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 19.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 2.1%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.1%), births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 17.2%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.5% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 1.0%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 41.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 26.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 60.1%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 54.4%), and master's degree (11.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.0%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.2% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.27%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.0%).