Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,344,413 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.323. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 14.7 Immigrants from Ghana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($35,629 compared to $39,894, a difference of 12.0%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and per capita income ($37,407 compared to $41,131, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $51,333, a difference of 0.88%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,066 compared to $87,760, a difference of 3.2%), and median household income ($78,166 compared to $81,489, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.3%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and single mother poverty (31.9% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.010%), female unemployment (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.5%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.5%), births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (29.7% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 82.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 62.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 9.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 23.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 43.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 33.3%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.6%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.58%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.3%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.2% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.75%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.8%).