Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Nepal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,614,308 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.786. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.105% in Immigrants from Nepal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to an increase of 104.8 Immigrants from Nepal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,407 compared to $44,187, a difference of 18.1%), median male earnings ($47,990 compared to $55,615, a difference of 15.9%), and median family income ($90,918 compared to $104,966, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 0.59%), householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $52,611, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,089 compared to $61,843, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 35.2%), receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 30.2%), and family poverty (10.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.3%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 26.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 26.1%), births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 20.9%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.6%), currently married (44.5% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 51.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 31.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 9.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 57.5%), master's degree (11.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 50.7%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.91%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.74%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.2%).