Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Syria Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,923,289 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Syria within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.090. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Immigrants from Syria. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to an increase of 6.9 Immigrants from Syria.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,407 compared to $45,218, a difference of 20.9%), median male earnings ($47,990 compared to $56,830, a difference of 18.4%), and median family income ($90,918 compared to $106,118, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $51,494, a difference of 0.56%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,089 compared to $62,303, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 20.3%), family poverty (10.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 20.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.6%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.3%), births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 21.8%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.5%), family households (67.0% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (29.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 32.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 20.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.65%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 50.5%), master's degree (11.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 43.8%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.92%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 15.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.92%), female disability (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.1%).