Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Indonesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,264,690 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.274. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Immigrants from Indonesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to an increase of 28.3 Immigrants from Indonesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,407 compared to $48,195, a difference of 28.8%), median male earnings ($47,990 compared to $60,935, a difference of 27.0%), and median family income ($90,918 compared to $115,162, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $55,521, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,089 compared to $66,694, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 39.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 38.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 5.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 29.2%), births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 29.1%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.0% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (29.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and average family size (3.43 compared to 3.27, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 16.3%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 71.2%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 63.7%), and master's degree (11.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 56.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.82%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.82%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 24.7%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 4.6%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.9%).