Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,050,892 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.471. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to an increase of 23.5 Immigrants from Malaysia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,407 compared to $49,983, a difference of 33.6%), median male earnings ($47,990 compared to $62,121, a difference of 29.4%), and median family income ($90,918 compared to $115,880, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $54,179, a difference of 4.6%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,089 compared to $65,497, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 32.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 30.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.45%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 33.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 37.7%), births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 30.7%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.8%), family households (67.0% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 49.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 42.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 5.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 27.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 85.5%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 74.9%), and master's degree (11.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 68.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.87%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.87%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 23.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.7%), disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 11.0%).