Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Morocco Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,685,301 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.358. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.092% in Immigrants from Morocco. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to an increase of 92.2 Immigrants from Morocco.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,407 compared to $46,430, a difference of 24.1%), median male earnings ($47,990 compared to $56,958, a difference of 18.7%), and median female earnings ($35,629 compared to $42,229, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $54,593, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,089 compared to $60,647, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 20.3%), family poverty (10.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 19.0%), and married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 4.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 18.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.5%), births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 17.8%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (44.5% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 65.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 42.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 16.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 38.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 51.8%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 51.7%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.94%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.94%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 14.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 14.1%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.2%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 4.7%).