Mexican American Indian vs French American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,961,694 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.580. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to an increase of 23.4 French American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,407 compared to $40,244, a difference of 7.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $48,977, a difference of 5.7%), and median male earnings ($47,990 compared to $50,611, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,066 compared to $85,899, a difference of 0.98%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,811 compared to $89,811, a difference of 1.1%), and median family income ($90,918 compared to $92,872, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.2%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 14.6%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (19.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.80%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (29.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 11.9%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.5% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 1.0%), births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 23.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 15.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 50.8%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 15.1%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.2%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 18.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.13%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.2% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.9%).