Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Yemen Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,333,948 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Yemen within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.185. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Yemen. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 8.9 Immigrants from Yemen.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,811 compared to $74,575, a difference of 21.8%), median household income ($78,166 compared to $65,194, a difference of 19.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $43,591, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,629 compared to $34,693, a difference of 2.7%), median earnings ($41,719 compared to $39,540, a difference of 5.5%), and median male earnings ($47,990 compared to $44,083, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 99.6%), family poverty (10.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 60.9%), and receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.9% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 20.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 21.1%), and single female poverty (23.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 23.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 86.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 58.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 6.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.1%), births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 12.9%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.44%), family households with children (29.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.43 compared to 3.60, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 114.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 88.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 63.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 13.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 37.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 63.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 29.5%), college, under 1 year (58.1% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (89.0% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.030%), 8th grade (92.1% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and 7th grade (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.91%, a difference of 38.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 16.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and male disability (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.7%).