Mexican American Indian vs Hispanic or Latino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,616,287 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.434% in Hispanics or Latinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to an increase of 433.7 Hispanics or Latinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,089 compared to $52,832, a difference of 6.2%), median family income ($90,918 compared to $85,647, a difference of 6.1%), and median household income ($78,166 compared to $73,823, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 0.56%), householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $50,279, a difference of 3.0%), and median male earnings ($47,990 compared to $46,419, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 15.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.50%), single mother poverty (31.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and single female poverty (23.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 11.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.60%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.4%), births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.15%), family households (67.0% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 0.61%), and family households with children (29.7% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 10.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.030%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 5.1%), no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.020%), 9th grade (90.9% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and 5th grade (95.5% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.99%), and disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 1.1%).