Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Cambodia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,850,389 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Immigrants from Cambodia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to an increase of 16.2 Immigrants from Cambodia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($35,629 compared to $38,833, a difference of 9.0%), per capita income ($37,407 compared to $40,434, a difference of 8.1%), and median earnings ($41,719 compared to $45,090, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $52,450, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($56,089 compared to $57,580, a difference of 2.7%), and wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and single female poverty (23.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.13%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.3%), family households with children (29.7% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.43 compared to 3.33, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.5% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 0.090%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.9%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 14.7%), bachelor's degree (30.2% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (95.8% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and 6th grade (95.0% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and male disability (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.47%).