Mexican American Indian vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,239,462 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.239. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.068% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 68.2 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,407 compared to $53,874, a difference of 44.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,066 compared to $119,496, a difference of 40.5%), and median family income ($90,918 compared to $125,312, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 7.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $58,239, a difference of 12.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,089 compared to $70,238, a difference of 25.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 47.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 47.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 4.0%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 35.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.94%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 47.7%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 44.3%), and births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.0% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.9%), average family size (3.43 compared to 3.24, a difference of 5.7%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 54.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 30.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 110.5%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 99.7%), and master's degree (11.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 81.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.78%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.81%), and kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 36.0%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 29.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.2%).