Mexican American Indian vs U.S. Virgin Islander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,978,016 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.490. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in U.S. Virgin Islanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to an increase of 40.4 U.S. Virgin Islanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,811 compared to $82,736, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $47,448, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($37,407 compared to $37,589, a difference of 0.49%), median earnings ($41,719 compared to $41,448, a difference of 0.65%), and median male earnings ($47,990 compared to $47,066, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 20.2%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 16.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.9% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 2.1%), single female poverty (23.4% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.8% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 13.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.8%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 16.9%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.43 compared to 3.29, a difference of 4.1%), family households (67.0% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 81.1%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 69.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 7.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 23.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 51.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 37.4%), master's degree (11.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 16.3%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.85%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.87%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.0%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.8%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.2% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.3%).