Mexican American Indian vs Pennsylvania German Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,845,154 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.788. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.169% in Pennsylvania Germans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to an increase of 169.4 Pennsylvania Germans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 24.1%), householder income over 65 years ($56,089 compared to $52,888, a difference of 6.0%), and median male earnings ($47,990 compared to $50,878, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,066 compared to $85,836, a difference of 0.91%), median family income ($90,918 compared to $91,763, a difference of 0.93%), and per capita income ($37,407 compared to $37,842, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 29.0%), married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.43%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.48%), and single female poverty (23.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 26.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 26.5%), and female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.51%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 29.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 26.8%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.24%), family households (67.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 21.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 0.36%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 114.9%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and college, 1 year or more (51.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 55.3%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 22.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 6.1%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 6.7%).