Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,865,000 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.916. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.290% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to an increase of 289.5 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $43,266, a difference of 19.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,066 compared to $72,178, a difference of 17.9%), and median household income ($78,166 compared to $66,768, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,629 compared to $34,317, a difference of 3.8%), per capita income ($37,407 compared to $35,720, a difference of 4.7%), and median earnings ($41,719 compared to $39,169, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 20.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 20.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.81%), receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 31.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 27.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (45.9% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 17.7%), family households (67.0% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 13.1%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 2.9%), average family size (3.43 compared to 3.23, a difference of 6.1%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 60.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 37.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.1%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 10.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 33.4%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 15.3%), and master's degree (11.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.78%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.79%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 17.4%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (26.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.59%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and male disability (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.0%).