Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Barbados Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,635,545 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Barbados within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Barbados. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Immigrants from Barbados.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 38.6%), median female earnings ($35,629 compared to $41,685, a difference of 17.0%), and per capita income ($37,407 compared to $41,478, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($78,166 compared to $78,989, a difference of 1.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,811 compared to $89,394, a difference of 1.6%), and median family income ($90,918 compared to $92,419, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 21.4%), receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 20.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.47%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.8% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 27.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 27.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 24.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 69.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.9%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 17.2%), and family households with children (29.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.38%), births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.43 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 224.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 133.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 98.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 28.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 64.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 98.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 26.9%), no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 19.9%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.51%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 29.6%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.20%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.27%).