Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Jamaica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,276,339 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.090. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from Jamaica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 7.0 Immigrants from Jamaica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 31.3%), median female earnings ($35,629 compared to $38,625, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,811 compared to $87,035, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,990 compared to $48,040, a difference of 0.10%), householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $51,038, a difference of 1.5%), and median family income ($90,918 compared to $89,268, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 22.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 12.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (15.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.35%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.69%), and poverty (14.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 22.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.90%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.3%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 13.5%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.43 compared to 3.33, a difference of 2.8%), family households (67.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 90.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 58.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 32.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 56.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 29.9%), master's degree (11.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.69%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.70%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.2% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.040%), disability (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.96%), and male disability (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.1%).