Immigrants from Mexico vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,146,400 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.342. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to an increase of 6.0 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 16.6%), householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $43,266, a difference of 16.5%), and median household income ($73,160 compared to $66,768, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($39,114 compared to $39,169, a difference of 0.14%), median male earnings ($44,960 compared to $44,204, a difference of 1.7%), and median family income ($83,639 compared to $82,216, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 21.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (25.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 0.11%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and single male poverty (13.9% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 39.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 30.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 18.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.2%), married-couple households (46.4% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 19.0%), and family households (69.1% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.57%), births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 71.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 44.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 52.5%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.2%), and professional degree (2.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 16.6%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.76%), male disability (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.0%).