Immigrants from Mexico vs Immigrants from Indonesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,142,416 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.343. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Indonesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to a decrease of 1.4 Immigrants from Indonesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,931 compared to $48,195, a difference of 42.0%), median family income ($83,639 compared to $115,162, a difference of 37.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,809 compared to $107,627, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $55,521, a difference of 10.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $66,694, a difference of 26.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 58.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 55.1%), and receiving food stamps (15.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 54.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 7.3%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 35.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 43.2%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 39.2%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 4.5%), family households (69.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.5%), no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 24.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 114.1%), professional degree (2.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 102.3%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 89.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 25.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.0%), disability age over 75 (51.1% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.8%).