Immigrants from Mexico vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,434,665 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.533. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to a decrease of 4.7 Immigrants from Ghana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,931 compared to $41,131, a difference of 21.2%), median female earnings ($33,236 compared to $39,894, a difference of 20.0%), and median earnings ($39,114 compared to $45,641, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $51,333, a difference of 1.8%), householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $58,624, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,809 compared to $87,760, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 28.0%), single female poverty (25.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 15.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and single male poverty (13.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 11.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.7%), married-couple households (46.4% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 11.2%), and family households with children (31.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.4%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 42.7%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 104.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 73.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 10.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 27.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 52.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 61.0%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 59.5%), and professional degree (2.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.3%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.32%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.3%).