Immigrants from Mexico vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,319,576 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.143. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to a decrease of 0.8 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,931 compared to $45,804, a difference of 35.0%), median family income ($83,639 compared to $110,011, a difference of 31.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,910 compared to $106,849, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $51,259, a difference of 1.7%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and median female earnings ($33,236 compared to $40,798, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 85.7%), receiving food stamps (15.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 59.9%), and family poverty (12.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.93%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and single male poverty (13.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 31.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 28.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.5%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 34.6%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.0%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 39.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 21.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 110.9%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 105.6%), and professional degree (2.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 96.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 28.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 25.8%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.87%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.7%).